SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 621

MANJUSHA P.NAMJOSHI
R. P. GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jagat Sher Singh, Paliwal, SURENDRA SINGH

( 1 ) THESE revisions are under section 397 read with Sections 401 and 482 of the Cr. P. C.

( 2 ) BOTH the revisions have one subject matter, hence they are being decided by one order. A copy of the order be tagged with other file.

( 3 ) THE accused is a General manager, Vindhyachai Super Thermal prcject/ntpc Ltd. Vindhya Nagar. District sidhi. The respondent No. 2 had filed complaint under provisions of Sections 25-26 inter State Migrant Workmen (RECS) Act, 1979 and the said complaint was registered by (he Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, waidhan (Baidhan), Singrouli, District Sidhi. The Case No. is 65/2006. The other case is under Sections 23 and 24 of the Contract labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970. The Case No. is 67/2006.

( 4 ) THE applicant had filed exemption applications in both the original cases before the lower Court under Section 205, Cr. P. C. for exemption from personal appearance. The trial Court by its orders dated 2-3-2006 kept the applications pending stating that so long the accused does not register his personal appearance his applications cannot be considered.

( 5 ) PARTIES heard, record perused.

( 6 ) ON persual of the record appears that the p











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top