SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 982

A.K.GOHIL, P.K.JAISWAL
STATE OF M. P. – Appellant
Versus
KALYAN SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mukund Bhardwaj, PADAM SINGH

ABHAY GOHIL, J.

( 1 ) STATE has filed this appeal under S. 377 of the Code of Criminal procedure for enhancement of sentence being aggrieved by the judgment dated 22-6-1990 passed by IInd Additional District judge to the Sessions Judge Vidisha in sessions Trial No. 73/86, whereby the learned judge convicted the respondent under S. 376, i. P. C. but sentenced him to undergone jail sentence, which was of five years and two months.

( 2 ) AS per prosecution story on 23rd April, 1985, the complainant Moharsingh had gone to the village Kheroda alongwith his daughter (prosecutrix) aged about'5 years for marriage of Sirnam Singh s/o. Harinarayan. 'barat' had gone to village Belot Chakk. At belot Chakk, Sanman Singh (P. W. 4)informed Mohar Singh that prosecutrix is missing and Kalyan Singh is also missing. Thereafter complainant, Harinarayan, khilan Singh and Lalaram went to search the prosecutrix and came back to village kheronda. When prosecutrix was not traceable, report of missing was lodged at P. S. Tyonda, which is Ex. P/1. Even after report the family members were involved in searching the girl. Bhagwan Singh (P. W. 10) was coming back from village Ghatera on bullock cart after leavi














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top