SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 921

N.K.MODY
MAYANK @ VAIBHAVA – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC IN GENERAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.SETHI, B.B.L.AGRAWAL, Pinky Yadav, S.S.Garg, T.C.JAIN

( 1 ) BEING aaggrieved by the order dated 23-10-2003 passed by XVII ADJ, indore in Succession Case No. 8/2002, whereby the application filed by the appellant under Section 278 of the India Succession act, 1925 (which shall be referred hereinafter as "act") has been rejected, the present appeal has been filed.

( 2 ) SHORT facts of the case are that deceased was Ms. Renuka Bai w/o Balkrishna, who passed away on 6-11-1998. After her death the appellant filed a petition under section 278 of the Act on 3-8-2000 alleging that the deceased-Renuka Bai executed the registered Will on 22-8-1995 before her death, where by the property which is a house bearing municipal No. 70, old 81, now situated at Barabhai, Indore was given to the appellant. Hence, it was prayed that the letter of Administration be issued in his favour.

( 3 ) THE petition filed by the appellant was opposed by the respondents on various grounds and it was prayed that petition for grant of Probate/letter of Administration be dismissed. On the basis of the pleadings, the learned Court below framed the issues recorded the evidence and at the time of passing of order the learned Court below vide order dated 23-10-2003 dismissed









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top