SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 1328

S.SAMVATSAR
HARVINDER KAUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ami Prabal, J.S.Kaurav, K.S.Tomar

( 1 ) THIS petition is filed by the petitioners challenging orders Annexures-P-2, p-4, P-5 and P-6 dated 5-1-1998, 24-7-2001, 2-4-2002 and 5-5-2003 respectively.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts of the case are that the petitioners have entered into an agreement dated 28-8-1978 with Kishanlal s/o ganpatlal John for purchase of a house situated at MLB Board opposite Phoolbagh, lashkar, Gwalior. The agreement was not complied with by respondents No. 4 to 10, hence the present petitioners filed a suit for specific performance No. 18-A/1991. The decree for specific performance was passed in favour of the present petitioners on 13-10-1995 and in execution of the said decree the Court directed to execute the sale deed in favour of the present petitioners.

( 3 ) THE sale deed was presented before the Registrar of Stamps for registration. The registrar at the time of registration referred the matter for fixing market value vide order annexure P-2 dated 5-1-1998. On his reference, the Collector of Stamp issued notices to the petitioners, who filed objections annexure P-3 and P-3-A. According to the petitioners, as they have purchased the property in pursuance of an agreement to sale in their favour, which





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top