DIPAK MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant undertook Class-X examination conducted by the Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal in the year 2005. In the subject of Sanskrit, she was awarded 28 marks out of 50. Being aggrieved by the said valuation, she applied for scrutiny of the answer paper. The Board on scrutiny found that there had been no error in tabulation or computation and accordingly rejected the prayer.

( 2 ) BEING dissatisfied and aggrieved by the aforesaid action of the Board, the petitioner preferred W. P. No. 13674/2005. The learned single Judge placing reliance on the decisions rendered in the cases of Maharashtra state Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education and another v. Paritosh bhupesh Kumar Sheth and others, AIR 1984 sc 1543, and Neha Indurkhya v. M. P. Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal, 2003 (3)MPLJ 368 expressed the opinion that no case has been made out for directing revaluation especially in the absence of any provision for the same.

( 3 ) QUESTIONING the correctness of the aforesaid order, it is submitted by Mr. Anil tiwari, learned counsel for the appellant that though there is no provision for revaluation of the answer scripts but in certain cas