SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 701

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
AMAR BAHADUR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DEVENDRA SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.P.Singh, J.L.Mishra, Lal Satyendra Singh Baghel

( 1 ) THIS second appeal has been filed at the instance of plaintiff whose suit has been dismissed by the learned trial court and the appeal filed by him before the learned first appellate Court, has also been dismissed.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF-AMAR Bahadur Singh filed suit for injunction and for declaration that he is the owner having half share in the suit property. The suit property is a house, description whereof has been mentioned in the plaint.

( 3 ) THE pleadings of the plaintiff in the plaint is that vide partition deed dated 21-6-1972 there was a partition in the family and by this document of partition plaintiff-Amar Bahadur Singh and defendant No. 2-Sheetala Prasad Singh who are real brothers partitioned the property mentioned in the partition deed and it was agreed between the plaintiff and defendant No. 2 that the property shall be sold and the sale price will be divided in two shares equally. However, the suit property which is a house could not be sold and, therefore, the suit property is the joint property of plaintiff and defendant no. 2 in which he is having share.

( 4 ) DEFENDANT No. 1-Devendra Singh who is the son of defendant No. 2 filed written statement, but defendan




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top