A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
AMAR BAHADUR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DEVENDRA SINGH – Respondent
( 2 ) PLAINTIFF-AMAR Bahadur Singh filed suit for injunction and for declaration that he is the owner having half share in the suit property. The suit property is a house, description whereof has been mentioned in the plaint.
( 3 ) THE pleadings of the plaintiff in the plaint is that vide partition deed dated 21-6-1972 there was a partition in the family and by this document of partition plaintiff-Amar Bahadur Singh and defendant No. 2-Sheetala Prasad Singh who are real brothers partitioned the property mentioned in the partition deed and it was agreed between the plaintiff and defendant No. 2 that the property shall be sold and the sale price will be divided in two shares equally. However, the suit property which is a house could not be sold and, therefore, the suit property is the joint property of plaintiff and defendant no. 2 in which he is having share.
( 4 ) DEFENDANT No. 1-Devendra Singh who is the son of defendant No. 2 filed written statement, but defendan
REFERRED TO : Supreme Court Gurdev Kaur and others v. Kaki and others
Santakumari v. Lakshmi Amma Janaki Amma
Mohd.Abdul Muqtedar v. Shaikh Fakruddin
Md.Hadi Hussain v. Abdul Hamidi Choudhary
Sundra Naicka Vaidyar v. Ramaswami Ayyar
V.Ramachandra Ayyar and another v. Ramalingam Chettiar and another
Karnataka Board of Wakf v. Anjuman-E-Ismail Madris-Un-Niswan
Baidyanath Bhattacharya and another v. S.Karmakar
Sri Chand Gupta v. Gulzar Singh
Smt.Chander Kali Bail v. Jagdish Singh Thakur
Rajappa Hanamantha Ranoji v. Mahadev Chakannabasappa
K.C.Mathew and Sons v. A. Sulaikha Beevi
State of Rajasthan v. Harphool Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.