SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 108

DIPAK MISRA
M. P. HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anuradha Pandit, S.N.YADAV

DIPAK MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THE M. P. Human Rights Commission (for short 'the Commission') through its Registrar has visited this Court for issue of a writ of certiorari for quashment of the order dated 13-6-2000, Annexure P/9, and to command the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to implement the recommendations of the commission contained in Annexure P/7, and further to command the respondent nos. 1 and 2 to ensure quality outcome in the 'eye-Camps' organised by the District blindness Control Society (DBCS ).

( 2 ) THE facts as have been undraped are that under the National Programme for Control of Blindness, the State of M. P. has been organising eye camps with a view to provide comprehensive eye care to the community in the rural areas. The eye camps include surgical camps. The aims and objects of such camps are to provide medical and surgical treatment for the prevention and control of eye diseases including cataract operation and to educate people in methods of prevention of eye diseases and proper care of the eyes in order to ensure better and lasting eye sight. The programme further emphasises that quality outcome should be of paramount importance. Caution must be exercised to ensure that qu



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top