SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 754

UMA NATH SINGH
OMPRAKASH AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Alka Pandya, SHOBHIT ADITYA

UMA NATH SINGH, J.

( 1 ) THIS criminal Revision impugns the order dated 16-5-2002, passed by the learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Hoshangabad in S. T. No. 32/2002, whereby he has framed charges against the applicant under Sections 306, 498-A and 509, IPC.

( 2 ) ADMITTEDLY, deceased Dharmesh and his wife Sandhya were the son and daughter-in-law of the applicant. They had committed suicide by consuming pesticide and they were declared dead in the hospital. As per materials on record, the prosecution submitted a challan for charge under Section 306, IPC on the ground that the applicant used to harass the daughter-in-law Sandhya and consequently, also used to harass his son Dharmesh. The precise allegation against the applicant is that he is a pervert who used to somdomise his domestic servant, Vishal and Vishal in turn took liberty to Sodomise Saurav, grand son of the applicant, which caused a lot of mental agony and trauma to both the deceased, being the parents of Saurav, who, resultantly, committed suicide. As regards the charge under Section 498-A , IPC, the prosecution has collected the materials to the effect that within seven years of her marriage deceased Sandhya was dr








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top