SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 429

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
DIPAK MISRA, UMA NATH SINGH
MANOHAR SINGH MARWAHA - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M.P. - Respondents
W. P. 3198 Of 2000
Decided On : 04/12/2002

Advocates Appeared:
MANOJ SHARMA, R.N.Singh, R.P.AGRAWAL, R.S.JHA

The resolution and notification were quashed on the ground that the resolution was not passed by the Municipal Corporation but by the Standing Committee, rendering it null and void.

Headnote:

Notification - Validity of Dairy Farming Ban - M. P. Pashu (Niyantran) Adhiniyam, 1976 - Sections 4 and 6 - The court quashed the impugned resolution and notification on the ground that the resolution was not passed by the Municipal Corporation but by the Standing Committee, rendering it null and void.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, owners of dairy farms, challenged the validity of a notification issued by the Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur, imposing a ban on dairy farming in two villages. The petitioners alleged that the standing committee lacked jurisdiction to pass the resolution and that it was a mala fide act suffering from procedural ultra vires.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the resolution passed by the Standing Committee was beyond its competence and therefore quashed the resolution and the subsequent notification.

Issues: The main issue was the validity of the resolution and notification, with the petitioners alleging lack of jurisdiction, mala fide intent, and procedural ultra vires.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the rule that where a power is given to do a certain thing in a certain way, the thing must be done in that way or not at all, and held that the resolution passed by the Standing Committee was procedurally ultra vires.

Final Decision: The writ petitions were allowed, and the resolution and notification were quashed.

UMA NATH SINGH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners, owners of Dairy farms in the gwarighat area of Jabalpur have called in question the validity of the notification dt. 19-3-1999 issued by the Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur in excercise of powers vested under Clause 19 (1) (b) of Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur Pashu (Niyantran) Adesh, 1978 towards the implementation of the resolution No. 70 dt. 21-10-1997 passed by the standing committee thereof, which was incompetent to do so. By the impugned notification a complete ban was imposed on carrying out dairy farming in two villages, namely, Gwarighat and Lalpur which were earlier exempted from being out of bounds for keeping cattles. In its hind-sight, the resolution No. 70 dated 21-10-97 was passed by the standing committee of Municipal Corporation Jabalpur for shifting all dairies by the end of 1997 from city area to out-skirits of the township, with a view to protect the residents against any health hazards as also to keep the city clean and absolutely free from water pollution, feared to be more likely on account of the region being prone to frequent earthquakes and location of the dairy farms also being in close proximity of water pipe line passing through that area. The challenge is directed, inter alia, mainly on the grounds that (a) the standing committee lacked jurisdiction being incompetent to pass any such resolution as the powers anchored to, under Section 4 of the M. P. Pashu (Niyantran) Adhiniyam, 1976 (hereinafter to be referred to as Act No. 21 of 1976) regarding control, maintenance, supply, and distribution, etc. have been delegated by the State Government under Section 6 of the Act, to the Municipal Corporation and not to its standing committee; (b) that it was mala fide act which also suffered from the vice of non-application of mind and colourable exercise of power; and (c) that it is a pronounced case of procedural ultra vires.

( 2 ) AS per averments in the petitions, the petitioners are established in the business of dairy farming for quite some time. Presently, they are running their dairy farms from villages called Gwarighat and Lalpur in Jabalpur. They allege that the respondents herein have been pressurising the dairy owners of Jabalpur on one pretext or other, right since 1971 to shift their dairy farms from the township of Jabalpur to places out-side its Municipal Area which led to protracted litigation on various counts.

( 3 ) THE action as such of the Municipal Corporation (resp. No. 2) was questioned by way of a writ petition registered as M. P. No. 738/1971 (Sundarlal and 76 others v. The Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur and another), which was disposed of in view of a scheme, where under, the respondent No. 2 was to reserve three huge plots in the out-skirts of the township for dairy farms. Thereafter, there was another set of litigation by way of writ petition No. M. P. No. 643/76 (Sardar Santok Singh and 66 others v. Municipal Corporation) filed in this Court which impugned the payment of development charges. The said writ petition was dismissed on 2-7-76. As a result, the dairy owners of Jabalpur were either to shift their dairy farms on to three reserved plots or to make their own arrangements. The dairy owners preferred the later and chose to make their own arrangements. They purchased agricultural lands situated in the out-skirts of the township and shifted their dairy farms. In the mean time, the respondents came out with the Act No. 21 of 1976. The relevant provisions of the Act namely, Sections 4 and 6 on reproduction read as under :"4. Powers to control maintenance, supply, distribution, etc. (1) If the State Government is of the opinion that it is necessary or expedient so to do for the purpose of promoting the public safety or public convenience or public health, it may, by a notified order, prohibit or regulate the keeping, maintaining or movement of any cattle in any particular place or area specified in such order. (2) Without prejudice to t
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top