SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 838

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
S. P. KHARE
S.N.VERMA - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M.P. - Respondents
W. P. 1817 Of 2002
Decided On : 07/25/2003

Advocates Appeared:
K.C.Ghildiyal, Panel Lawyer, S.M.Lal, Sharad Verma

The central legal point established in the judgment is that Panchayat employees are entitled to gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and the provisions for payment of gratuity are minimal service conditions that must be made available to employees, irrespective of the employer's financial capacity.

Headnote:

Gratuity - Panchayat Employee - Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Section 2(e), Section 2(f), Notification No. G.S.R. 239 dated 8/01/1982 - The court held that a Panchayat employee is entitled to gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, as the Act applies to employees of local bodies, including Panchayats. The court emphasized that the provisions for payment of gratuity are minimal service conditions that must be made available to employees, regardless of the employer's financial capacity.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a retired Panchayat employee, filed a writ petition seeking payment of gratuity, which had been rejected by the respondents. The petitioner claimed that the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 applied to Panchayat employees and that he was entitled to gratuity.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 applied to Panchayat employees, and as the respondent Panchayat employed more than ten persons, the petitioner was entitled to gratuity under the Act. The court quashed the impugned order and directed the respondents to make payment of gratuity to the petitioner.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner, as a Panchayat employee, was entitled to gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Act applied to Panchayat employees, as it encompassed employees of local bodies, including Panchayats. The court emphasized that the provisions for payment of gratuity were minimal service conditions that must be made available to employees, regardless of the employer's financial capacity.

Final Decision: The petition was allowed, the impugned order was quashed, and the respondents were directed to make payment of gratuity to the petitioner as per the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

S. P. KHARE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing order dated January 25, 2002 (Annexure-A/9) by which the application of the petitioner for payment of gratuity has been rejected and for a direction to the respondents to pay gratuity to him.

( 2 ) IT is not in dispute that the petitioner retired from the services of Janpad Panchayat, kherlanji, district Balaghat on attaining age of superannuation of 58 years on 30/06/1996. The petitioner claimed gratuity but it has been rejected. He made several representations and even then it was not paid to him. In the judgment dated 27/06/1997 in Writ Petition no. 1743 of 1997 of this Court there are certain observations that a Janpad Employee is entitled to gratuity but not the pension as per Madhya pradesh Janpad Panchayat Employees (Qualifications, Recruitment and Conditions of service) Rules, 1976. This judgment is reported in Janpad Panchayat Tatha Zila panchayat Karamchari Sangh and others v. State of M. P. and others, 1998 (1) JLJ 336. The petitioner has not been paid the gratuity on the ground that he had retired before the date of this judgment. That is also the stand taken by the respondents in their return.

( 3 ) THE learned counsel for both the sides have been heard. The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the Act') would apply to the case of the petitioner and other Panchayat employees. The definitions of "employee" and "employer" are given in section 2 (e) and (f) of the Act, which are as under:" (E) "employee" means any person (other than an apprentice) employed on wages, in any establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop, to do any skilled, semi-skilled, or unskilled, manual, supervisory, technical or clerical work, whether the terms of such employment are express or implied, and whether or -not such person is employed in a managerial or administrative capacity, but does not include any such person who holds a post under the Central Government or a state Government and is governed by afly other Act or by any rules providing for payment of gratuity. "" (f) "employer" means, in relation to any establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, Railway Company or shop (I) Belonging to, or under the control of the central Government or appropriate government, a person, or authority appointed by the appropriate Government for the supervision and control of employees, or where no person or authority has been so appointed, the head of the ministry of the Department concerned. (II) Belonging to, or under the control of, any local authority, the person appointed by such authority for the supervision and control of employees or where no person has been so appointed, the Chief Executive officer of the local authority. (in) In any other case, the person, who, or the authority which has the ultimate control over the affairs of the establiesment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop, and where the said affairs are entrusted to any other person, whether called a manager, managing director or by any other name, such person.

( 4 ) NOTIFICATION No. G. S. R. 239 dated 8/01/1982 of the Government of India published in the gazette on 23/01/1982 is as under:"in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (c) of sub-section (3) of Section 1 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (39 of 1972), the Central Government hereby specifies 'local bodies' in which ten or more persons are employed, or were employed, on any day of the preceding twelve months, as a class of establishments to which the said act shall apply with effect from the date of publication of this notification in the Official gazette. "

( 5 ) THE definition of 'employer' as given above shows that it includes "local authority". Further as per notification mentioned above, the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 has been made applicable to the employees of the local bodies. Accordin





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top