SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 191

S.P.SRIVASTAVA
KUSUM VERMA – Appellant
Versus
PRITAM SINGH GULATI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajay Chaturvedi

S. P. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) FEELING aggrieved by the order passed by the trial Court deciding issue No. 7 against the defendant/applicants holding that the suit was not barred in view of the provisions contained in the Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1961, and was entertainable and maintainable in the Civil Court; the defendant/applicants have now approached this Court seeking redress praying for reversal of the order.

( 2 ) I have heard the learned counsel for the defendant/applicants as well as the learned counsel for the plaintiff/respondent, and have also carefully perused the record.

( 3 ) THE facts in brief, shorn of details, and necessary for the disposal of this revision lie in a narrow compass. The suit giving rise to this revision was filed by Pritam Singh Gulati, the plaintiff/respondent No. 1, wherein the Rastriya Adarsh Grah Nirman Sahkari Sanstha, Dr. Smt. Kusum Verma and Dr. S. K. Verma, have been impleaded as defendants Nos. 1 to 3, respectively.

( 4 ) THE Rastriya Adarsh Grah Nirman Sahakari Sanstha (Regd.), the defendant No. 1 is a housing society which acquires land and after carving out the plots allots them to its members thereafter they are transferre



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top