SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(MP) 460

D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
BALDEO KUMAR AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
MANAGING DIRECTOR, M. P. RAJYA LAGHU VAN UPAJ SAHKARI SANGH MARYADIT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.M.AGRAWAL, S.L.SAXENA

D. M. DHARMADHIKARI, J.

( 1 ) IN this revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, preferred by the present applicant who is plaintiff in the trial Court, a pure question of jurisdiction of Civil Court has been raised which has been decided against the plaintiff by the trial Court. The learned trial Judge i. e. the District Judge, Balaghat by the impugned order dated 4-4-1995 held that the claim lodged by the plaintiff against the respondent-Co-operative Society (namely, M. P. Rajya Laghu Van Upaj Sahkari Sangh Maryadit) is exclusively referable as a dispute for decision to the Registrar of Co-operative Societies under Section 64 of the M. P. Co-operative Societies Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) and the Civil Court's jurisdiction is expresslsy barred under Section 82 (1) (c) of the said Act.

( 2 ) BEFORE considering the contentions advanced on behalf of the plaintiff by the learned Counsel Shri M. M. Agrawal, Advocate, it is necessary to examine the nature of the claim laid in the civil suit. The defendant Co-operative Society issued a tender notice inviting tender for purchase and sale of Marribulam (Harra), a forest product. The plaintiff submit
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top