D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
BALDEO KUMAR AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
MANAGING DIRECTOR, M. P. RAJYA LAGHU VAN UPAJ SAHKARI SANGH MARYADIT – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, preferred by the present applicant who is plaintiff in the trial Court, a pure question of jurisdiction of Civil Court has been raised which has been decided against the plaintiff by the trial Court. The learned trial Judge i. e. the District Judge, Balaghat by the impugned order dated 4-4-1995 held that the claim lodged by the plaintiff against the respondent-Co-operative Society (namely, M. P. Rajya Laghu Van Upaj Sahkari Sangh Maryadit) is exclusively referable as a dispute for decision to the Registrar of Co-operative Societies under Section 64 of the M. P. Co-operative Societies Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) and the Civil Court's jurisdiction is expresslsy barred under Section 82 (1) (c) of the said Act.
( 2 ) BEFORE considering the contentions advanced on behalf of the plaintiff by the learned Counsel Shri M. M. Agrawal, Advocate, it is necessary to examine the nature of the claim laid in the civil suit. The defendant Co-operative Society issued a tender notice inviting tender for purchase and sale of Marribulam (Harra), a forest product. The plaintiff submit
The South Gujarat Roofing Tiles Manufacturers Association v. State of Gujarat
State Bank of India Employees Co-operative Housing Society Limited v. Nawal Shankar Dave
State Bank of India Employees Co-operative Housing Society v. Nawal Shankar Dave
Deccan Merchants Co-operarative BankLimited v. M/s. Dalichand Jugraj Jain
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.