SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 435

S.P.SRIVASTAVA
SUJAN PAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
CHANDAN SINGH PATEL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N.MALHOTRA, N.D.SINGHAL

S. P. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) FEELING aggrieved by the quantum of compensation fixed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Gwalior (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) under the impugned award, the parents/claimants have now come up in appeal seeking enhancement of the compensation and modification of the award in question accordingly.

( 2 ) I have heard the learned counsel for the appellants as well as the learned counsel representing the contesting respondent, and have carefully perused the record.

( 3 ) THE facts in brief shorn of details, and necessary for the disposal of this appeal, lie in a narrow compass. An application under Section 110-A (or S. 166) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was filed by the appellants praying for compensation of an amount of Rs. 4,50,000/-, on account of the death of their minor son, Monu aged about 10 years who had died as a result of the accident involving the offending vehicle, a tractor with trolley with registration No. M. B. H. 6832, in the evening of 10-5-1988.

( 4 ) MONU, the deceased was going along with his younger brother to purchase a kite in a narrow lane where he met with an accident and got cru





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top