SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(MP) 500

S.P.SRIVASTAVA, N.G.KARAMBELKAR
SUNEER SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
MADHURLATA SHARMA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mahesh Haswani, V.K.BHARDVAJ

N. G. KARAMBELKAR, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANT/defendant-HUSBAND Dr. Suneer Sharma has filed this appeal against the judgment and decree dated 8-5-1998 passed by the learned single Judge of this Court in First Appeal No. 220/97 confirming the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court in case No. 576-A/91.

( 2 ) FACTS not disputed are that the appellant and the respondent were married on 16-11-1984 at Kherapati Colony, Gwalior. At the time of marriage, appellant was possessing M. B. B. S. degree and the respondent-wife was possessing post graduate degree in medical science. At that time, appellant was serving as a medical officer in Co-operative Sugar Factory at Panipat. In the same year the respondent wife got an appointment as medical officer in N. F. L. Panipat where she was also allotted an official residence in the campus of the hospital. The couple lived peacefully for a period of about 2 years in the ancestral residence of the appellant at Panipat. However, when after a lapse of 2 years, the respondent did not conceive, she was subjected to number of medical tests and investigations and as per reports there were little chances of her conceiving. The respondent is living separate i










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top