SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(MP) 481

B.A.KHAN, SHAMBHOO SINGH
GAJANAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.S.GARG, D.D.Vyas, G.M.CHAPHEKAR, M.M.ASUDANI, S.RAY, VIVEK TANKHA

B. A. KHAN, J.

( 1 ) ONE LPA and these petitions involve similar questions of law and fact and are disposed off by this common judgment. Even though, writ petitioners are represented by more than one counsel, Shri M. M. Asudani took it upon himself to deputise for them all, to facilitate disposal of these petitions hanging fire since 1996 and going through bouts of litigations from here to the Apex Courts and back.

( 2 ) PETITIONERS are Bhumi Swamies of around 63 acres of land comprising survey Nos. 684/1, 684/1/3, 684/1/4, 684/1/5, 681/1/7, 684/1/8, 684/1/10, 684/2/1, 684/2/3, 684/2/4, 684/3/1, 684/3/2, 684/3/3, 684/3/4 and 684/3/5 in Patwari Halka No. 9, situate at Rangwasa, Tehsil-Indore, which is under acquisition for establishment of a "diamond Park" euphemism for Industrial area to accommodate diamond cutting and polishing units. They are engaged in a life and death struggle to ward off the acquisition and their attack to it is multipronged ranging from technicalities of law to national Security considerations.

( 3 ) IT all seems to have started in 1994 when State Government formulated its Industrial Policy providing special facilities/incentives to promote 100% export orient





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top