SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(MP) 324

S.P.KHARE
BALRAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.S.Thakur, J.S.Singh

S. P. KHARE, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANTS Balram and Maharani have been convicted under Ss. 306 and 498-A, I. P. C. and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for ten years and three years respectively. They have also been sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- each for the offences under Ss. 306 and 498-A, I. P. C.

( 2 ) DECEASED Kalanbai was second wife of appellant Balram. This marriage took place five years before the death of Kalanbai. She committed suicide by setting her ablaze on 26-3-1987 in the house of her husband. Appellant Maharani is his mother. Rambatibai (P. W. 10) is first wife of appellant Balram. She has remarried Kaluram and she is living with him. These facts are not in dispute.

( 3 ) THIS case was referred to the Division Bench on a question of law. That was whether S. 113-A of the Evidence Act is attracted where the wife who has committed suicide was not "legally married". It has been answered in the affirmative.

( 4 ) THE only point which has been raised in this appeal is whether the appellants abetted the commission of suicide by Kalanbai. On this point there is evidence of Rajaram (P. W. 2), brother of the deceased and his wife Kusamrani (P. W. 11 ). The testimony of these






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top