( 1 ) THIS appeal was admitted on the following substantial questions of law :- (I) "whether in the absence of requirements of Order VII, Rule 3 of code of Civil Procedure whereby full particulars and identity disputed portion is not mentioned in the plaint, suit is liable to be decreed?" (ii) Whether in the absence of map of demarcation and proof of report of demarcation the Appellate court was right in considering the document of Panchanama?" (iii) "whether the suit of plaintiff was maintainable without impleading the State of M. P. as provided under Order 1, Rule 3-B of Code of civil Procedure?"

( 2 ) BRIEF facts of the case are that the plaintiff/respondent has filed a civil suit for possession of agricultural land. The. plaintiff claimed that he is the Bhumiswami of the land bearing survey No. 101 area 0. 240 hectare, situated in village Bamuliya, Tehsil Sironj, District vidisha. This land is 'kheda'. A public road in on the western side of the land. The house of the defendant is towards southern side of the suit land and remaining lands of the defendant are extended on other two sides of the plaintiff's land. Plaintiff's land is surrounded by defendant's property