SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(MP) 663

J.G.CHITRA
INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, INDORE – Appellant
Versus
SATYAPAL ANAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.M.SHAH, V.K.JAIN

J. G. CHITRA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is hereby assailing correctness, propriety and legality of order which has been passed by 5th Additional District Judge, Indore in the matter of Civil O. S. 89-A/89. The said suit was filed by Shri Satyapal Anand for a decree against the present petitioner, along with Resp. 2-Indore Motor Parts Dealers Association-co-plaintiff in the said suit. As application in view of provisions of Order 11, Rule 12 r/w 151, CPC seeking discovery was filed by Resp. No. 1.- Satyapal Anand on 4-2-91 and by that application the discovery was sought in view of O. 11, R. 12. On 4-2-91 the learned trial Court rejected that application. Resp. 1 challenged that order by presenting Civil Revision No. 42/92. Said revision petition was heard and decided by this High Court by its order dt. 1-2-95 and by virtue of that order the present petitioner-Indore Development Authority was directed to make discovery on or before 3-3-95. It was also made clear that failing to comply with the said directions of making the discovery the present petitioner - I. D. A. was to face legal consequences.

( 2 ) THEREAFTER the matter was dealt with by the trial Court on 17-1-96 after giving man
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top