SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(MP) 944

DIPAK MISRA
SANJAY KUMAR GIRI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MANISH DATT, R.S.JHA, S.K.GANGARADE

DEEPAK MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THE applicant was taken into custody in connection with Crime No. 329/99 instituted for an offence punishable under Section 20 (i) (b) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the NDPS Act') on the allegation that he was in possession of 15 gms. of 'ganja'.

( 2 ) THE applicant filed an application for obtaining concession of bail before the learned Sessions Judge, Bhopal on the ground that he was below 16 years of age, and hence, he was entitled to the benefit as envisaged under the provisions of Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 and under Section 437 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code' ).

( 3 ) IT was put forth before the learned Special Judge that the date of birth of the petitioner is 7-10-85 and in support of the same certificate of the school and marksheet were produced. The learned Special Judge appreciating the documents brought on record and observing the appearance of the petitioner came to hold that the petitioner appeared to be more than 16 years of age and, accordingly, rejected the prayer for bail.

( 4 ) MR. S. K. Gangrade, learned Counsel for the applicant has contended










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top