SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(MP) 514

DIPAK MISRA
SUKHJEET SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SIRAJUNNISA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MANINDRA SHRIVASTAV, RAJIV SHRIVASTAVA

DEEPAK MISRA, J.

( 1 ) INVOKING the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') the defendant/applicant has called in question the defensibility of the judgment and decree dated 31-7-1999 passed by the learned Second Civil Judge Class II, Bilaspur in Civil Suit No. 211-A/96 whereby the said learned Judge decreed the suit of the plaintiff/non-applicant preferred under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' ).

( 2 ) THE facts as have been undraped are that the house of the defendant is situated adjacent to the lane of Sharma Tent House in Rajendra Nagar. There are two blocks in the said house and the plaintiff is residing in the South Block on payment of Rs. 250/- per month. It is stated that the tenanted premises include two living rooms, one kitchen and one veranda. In the other room the defendant resides. In Dec. 1994 marriage ceremony of the defendant was to be held for which he requested the plaintiff to handover the possession of the part of premises with an assurance that he would deliver back the possession after the marriage ceremony was over. Though, o














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top