SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(MP) 303

Y.B.SURYAVANSHI, A.G.QURESHI
SANJAI GANDHI GRAH NIRMAN SAHKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K.AGARWAL, V.S.KOKJE

A. G. QURESHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS order shall govern the disposal of Misc. Petitions Nos. 389/87, 489/87, 944/ 87, 76/88, 997/88, 1213/88, 1227/88, 1317/88, 141/89, 197/89, 222/89, 277/89, 561/89, 562/89, 600/89, 603/89, 610/89, 611/89, 612/89, 639/89, 645/89, 711/89, 788/89, 799/89, 974/89, 1188/89, 1189/89,1190/89, 1282/89, 91/90, 781/90 and 783/90, challenging the development scheme prepared by the Indore Development Authority known as Scheme No. 94 of the Indore Development Authority for Eastern Ring Road, and the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Collector and Ex Officio Deputy Secretary to the Government of Madhya Pradesh, Indore, for the implementation of that scheme.

( 2 ) SCHEME No. 94 of the Indore Development Authority has been prepared mainly for the construction of Eastern Ring Road around the city of Indore wherein provisions have also been kept for Regional Park, Commercial, Health, Bus Terminal, Industrial, Educational and Residential Buildings. Section 49 of the M. P. Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the 'adhiniyam') provides for the preperation of a town development scheme wherein provisions can be made for any of the matt





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top