Y.B.SURYAVANSHI, A.G.QURESHI
SANJAI GANDHI GRAH NIRMAN SAHKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS order shall govern the disposal of Misc. Petitions Nos. 389/87, 489/87, 944/ 87, 76/88, 997/88, 1213/88, 1227/88, 1317/88, 141/89, 197/89, 222/89, 277/89, 561/89, 562/89, 600/89, 603/89, 610/89, 611/89, 612/89, 639/89, 645/89, 711/89, 788/89, 799/89, 974/89, 1188/89, 1189/89,1190/89, 1282/89, 91/90, 781/90 and 783/90, challenging the development scheme prepared by the Indore Development Authority known as Scheme No. 94 of the Indore Development Authority for Eastern Ring Road, and the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Collector and Ex Officio Deputy Secretary to the Government of Madhya Pradesh, Indore, for the implementation of that scheme.
( 2 ) SCHEME No. 94 of the Indore Development Authority has been prepared mainly for the construction of Eastern Ring Road around the city of Indore wherein provisions have also been kept for Regional Park, Commercial, Health, Bus Terminal, Industrial, Educational and Residential Buildings. Section 49 of the M. P. Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the 'adhiniyam') provides for the preperation of a town development scheme wherein provisions can be made for any of the matt
Anupan Shahkari Griha Nirman Samiti Maryadit, Raipur v. State of M.P.
T. Damodhar Rao and others v. The Special Officer Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad
Deepak Pahwa v. Lt. Governor of Delhi
Amritsar Improvement Trust v. Baldev Inder Singh
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Jogendra Singh
Smt. Somawati v. State of Punjab
Laxmichand v. Indore Improvement Trust
Kanhaiyalal Maneklal Chinani v. State of Gujarat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.