SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(MP) 136

SHACHEENDRA DWIVEDI
RAMDAYAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.S.Dixit, R.D.Jain

SHACHEENDRA DWIVEDI, J.

( 1 ) BY this application, under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicants seek a direction for grant of bail, as they apprehend that they may be arrested in Crime No. 1 of 1991, registered by Police Station Harijan Kalyan, Morena, for offences punishable under sections 294, 323 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code and under sections 3 (1) (x) and (xiv) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (prevention of Attrocities) Act. 1989 (for short, the Act ).

( 2 ) SHRI C. S. Dixit, learned Dy. Government Advocate vehcmently opposed the application by raising a preliminary objection that since provisions of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (prevention of Attrocities) Act, 1989 are alleged to have been violated to bring the acts of the petitioners within the mischief of section 3 (l) (x) and (xiv) of the Act, section 18 of the Act, would put a ban against the consideration of the application for anticipatory bail.

( 3 ) IT would be relevant here to reproduce section 18 of the Act, which is as under: Section 438 of the Code not to apply to persons committing an offence under the Act. Nothing in section 438 of the Code shall apply in relation












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top