SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(MP) 263

D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
VIBHA SHRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
DINESH KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.B.AGRAWAL, R.P.Verma

D. M. DHARMADHIKARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS case is a typical instance of matrimonial mal-adjustment between couples who are both employed in service at two different places. The wife/appellant is serving as a teacher in a private school at Rajnandgaon. The husband/respondent is working as Field Supervisor in a Rural Bank in village Latabod, in Rajnandgaon district. They were married on 14-7-1986 and at the time of their marriage also they were employed. For a few months after the marriage they had a happy married life and now they have a daughter aged about 3 years. According to the husband, the wife left the matrimonial home on 16th Nov. , of 1986 when he was away on his duty. Before leaving the matrimonial home she had sent a letter of resignation from her service by registered post on 14/11/1986. The complaint of the husband is that thereafter be made several approaches personally, in writing and through his relations to persuade the wife to return to the matrimonial home but she persistently refused. Her insistence was that she would continue with her service and the husband should live with her at Rajnandgaon.

( 2 ) THE husband's case is that the above persistent refusal of the wife to























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top