SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(MP) 299

D.M.DHARMADHIKARI, B.C.VARMA
MUKUND DAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.V.TAMSKAR, N.C.JAIN, N.S.KALE, P.C.Naik, R.P.JAIN

B. C. VERMA, J.

( 1 ) IN this and in other connected Writ Petitions Nos. 3334, 2484, 2111, 2194, 2216, 2277, 2376, 2506, 2523, 2923, 3312, 3482, 3573, 3061, 3607, 3608, 3612, 3621, 3631, 3635, 3636, 3643, 3659, 3666, 3697, 3702, 3189, 2415, 3616, 3617, 2383, 3699, 2262, 2258, 3703, 2382 and 2249 of 1990 and 3, 4, 5,10, 47, 49, 101, 102, 110, 216, 217, 255, 274, 415, 463 and 218 of 1991, the disposal of which shall be governed by this order, challenge is to the legislative competence and the vires of certain provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1990, (Act No. 13 of 1990) and Rules made thereunder.

( 2 ) THE Indian polity has recognised the village panchayats and Janpad panchayats as the basic units of a Government. With the awakening of the desire to participate in the governance of the State, the demand for decentralisation of political power increased. In the erstwhile State of C. P. and Berar there were two Acts. The Central Provinces and Berar Panchayats Act, 1946 and the Central Provinces and Berar Local Government Act, 1948. Similar enactments were in force in the former State of Madhya Bharat, the Vindhyachal Pradesh Region, Bhopal Region and Sironj Regio





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top