SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(MP) 397

A.G.QURESHI
KAVINDRA JAIN – Appellant
Versus
AMRITLAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SAMVATSAR, VAGHMARE

A. G. QURESHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against the order of the Additional judge to the Court of District Judge, Jhabua in C. S. No. 3-A of 1988 passed on 10-4-1991.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to this revision petition in short are that the plaintiff filed a suit for possession of a house situated in Meghnagar against the present petitioner on the basis of the title of the house. The case of the plaintiff was that eight years before the suit the house was given to the defendant for his residence as licensee with a condition that the house would be vacated by the defendant upon demand by the plaintiff. Thereafter, it appears, that by a letter dated 30/05/1980 the defendant offered to purchase the said house. But the plaintiff did not agree to sell the house and instead demanded vacant possession of the house. Thereafter after serving a legal notice the plaintiff filed the suit on 16-8-1988.

( 3 ) THE suit was resisted by the defendant on the ground that the defendant is not the licensee of the plaintiff. According to the defendant, the plaintiff needed a loan of Rs. 8000/- and offered to keep the house in question as security by way of mortgage and as a result Rs. 80







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top