T.N.SINGH, R.C.LAHOTI
MAHENDRA ARORA AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, M. P. , GWALIOR – Respondent
( 1 ) WITH this petition, six other matters are heard analogously involving the common question of law of some importance. By this common Order, all seven Matters, of which brief particulars are itemised below, are disposed of. M. P. No. Petitioner/owner vehicle No. Seizure Date407/92 m. Aorra mp 07 1943 27-2-1992 (JOINTLY)r. K. Arora mpg 7171-do-431/92 m. S. Jadon mkw 7744-do-446/92 m. Arora cig 7605 28-2-1992449/92 r. P. Sharma m P 06 7527-do-461/92 r. N. Sikarwar mkh 7730 7-3-1992462/92 ashok Parashar cpg 57 27-2-1992 563/92 s. S. Tomar mp-06-A-1411 9-3-1992 (Jointly)a. K. Shrivastava mp-06-A-1601-do-subhash Pathak mp-06-6838-do-
( 2 ) THE common feature of all these cases is that the vehicles were seized by the Flying squad of the Transport Department operating on different dates in Gwalior region in different areas. Except in one (the instant petition), in all other matters, State of M. P. , through Secretary, Transport Department, is impleaded as the first respondent. During the course of hearing of these petitions, the Transport Commissioner, Shri Shivraj Singh, along with Regional Transport Officer, personally attended hearing and assisted Shri Kelkar, learne
Full Bench decision, V. Govindarajulu
C.S.T. v. Bhagwan Industries (P) Ltd.
Sheo Nath Singh v. Appellate Asstt. Commr.of Income-tax
Collector of Customs v. Shantilal and Co.
Hindu Religious Endowment v. Lakshmindra Tirtha Swamier of Shri Shrirur Mutt
Referred to : Sushil Sharmas case
State of Karnataka v. Gopalakrishna
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.