SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(MP) 234

M.V.TAMASKAR
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
M. P. ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DIPAK OKHADE, I.Nair

M. V. TAMASKAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS is defendant/ appellant's appeal against judgment and decree passed by District Judge, Chhindwara, in C. S. 12a/88, decided on 30-1-1990.

( 2 ) RESPONDENT/ plaintiff M. P. Electricity Board filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 48,000/alleging that money-orders were sent by its Administrative Officer, Distribution Centre of Panjra, Tehsil Amarwara, District Chhindwara through Post Officer Panjra to remit the amount recovered from the electric consumers to the Head Office, M. P. E. B. , Jabalpur. Amount of Rs. 1,94,766. 55 P. were sent by money-orders on different receipts. The Post Master though gave the receipts of the whole amount did not remit full and retained the amount which ultimately in the analysis amount of Rs. 47,737. 67 P. remained unremitted. A report was lodged and a demand was made for Rs. 48,237. 67 P. along with interest. A notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure was served but no reply was received from the appellant/ defendant.

( 3 ) THEREAFTER a suit was filed. The suit is based on documentary evidence Ex. 6, P. 2 to P. 37. The said amount was remitted between 14-8-1978 to 19-2-1980. The officers of the plaintiff conducted










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top