SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(MP) 825

U.L.BHAT, M.V.TAMASKAR, RAJEEV GUPTA
NIRBHAY SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Alka Pandya, S.L.Kochar

U. L. BHAT, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr PC filed by two accused in a private compliant alleging commission of offence under Section 302, IPC read with Sec. 34, I. P. C. The learned Single Judge who admitted the petition directed issue of notice to the State and further directed that in the meantime the applicant shall not be arrested until further orders. One of us (Bhat, C. J.) who heard the matter at a subsequent stage doubted the maintainability of the application and also the legality of the interim order and referred the matter to a Division Bench. The Division Bench was of the opinion that the matter should be examined by a Full Bench and accordingly has been made. That is how the matter has come before us.

( 2 ) THE police registered a case against two accused on the information furnished by the complaint. After investigation, charge-sheet has been filed against the two accused. Thereafter, the first informant filed a private complaint before the Court concerned alleging that he had laid information with the police against seven persons, but information was recorded only against two persons and this was done so to help the ot


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top