U.L.BHAT, M.V.TAMASKAR, D.K.JAIN, RAJEEV GUPTA, M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, NEW DELHI – Appellant
Versus
CHITAMAN – Respondent
( 1 ) CIVIL Revision 602 of 1992 has been filed by the insurer against a decision under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short the Acts directing the Insurance Company to pay compensation on account of no fault liability. Civil Revisions Nos. 589/92 and 454/93 have been filed by claimants in different cases against rejection of the claim for compensation under Section 140 of the Act. Civil Revision No. 70/93 has been filed by an owner of the vehicle alleged to have been involved in an accident who has been directed under Section 140 to pay compensation on account of no fault liability. Civil Revision No. 590/92 has been filed by an owner of the vehicle similarly placed. M. P. No. 2351/92 has been filed by a claimant under Article 227 of the Constitution whose claim for compensation under Sec. 140 of the Act has been rejected.
( 2 ) THE civil revision petitions have been referred to a Full Bench by a learned single Judge. The petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has been referred to a Full Bench by a Division Bench. Thus the cases came up before a Full Bench of three Judges who in the course of hearing were of the opinion that an earlier d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.