SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(MP) 820

U.L.BHAT, M.V.TAMASKAR, D.K.JAIN, RAJEEV GUPTA, M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, NEW DELHI – Appellant
Versus
CHITAMAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.S.Rupesh

U. L. BHAT, C. J.

( 1 ) CIVIL Revision 602 of 1992 has been filed by the insurer against a decision under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short the Acts directing the Insurance Company to pay compensation on account of no fault liability. Civil Revisions Nos. 589/92 and 454/93 have been filed by claimants in different cases against rejection of the claim for compensation under Section 140 of the Act. Civil Revision No. 70/93 has been filed by an owner of the vehicle alleged to have been involved in an accident who has been directed under Section 140 to pay compensation on account of no fault liability. Civil Revision No. 590/92 has been filed by an owner of the vehicle similarly placed. M. P. No. 2351/92 has been filed by a claimant under Article 227 of the Constitution whose claim for compensation under Sec. 140 of the Act has been rejected.

( 2 ) THE civil revision petitions have been referred to a Full Bench by a learned single Judge. The petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has been referred to a Full Bench by a Division Bench. Thus the cases came up before a Full Bench of three Judges who in the course of hearing were of the opinion that an earlier d
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top