SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 655

A. M. AHMADI, K. N. SINGH, KULDIP SINGH, P. B. SAWANT, RANGANATH MISRA
President Of India – Appellant
Versus
In The Matter Of: Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.GANGULY, A.K.SEN GUPTA, A.S.NAMBIYAR, A.SUBBA RAO, A.Subhashini, ASHOK MUKHOTY, Atul Chitale, C.S.VAIDYANATHAN, E.C.AGARWAL, F.F.MUTMANNA, F.F.RAO, F.S.NARIMAN, G.RAMASVAMY, G.UMAPATHY, Jayant Bhushan, JOSEPH A.VADAKKEL, K.K.VENUGOPAL, K.PARASARAN ATTORNEY, K.SUBRAHAMANYAM REDDY, K.V.VISHWANATHAN, M.K.KRISHNAMURTHY, M.M.GAGADHAR, M.VIRAPPA, MOHAN V.KATARIA, N.D.B.RAJU, N.GANAPATHI, Niranjana Singh, NOBIN SINGH, P.K.MANOHARAN, P.Mahale, P.N.Ramalingam, P.R.RAMASESHESH.S.PARIHARHAR, S.R.Bhatt, S.S.JAVALI, SANGITA GARG, SHALID RIZVI, SHANTA VASUDEVAN, SHANTI BHUSHAN, SUBHASH SHARMA, T.R.ANDHYARJUNA, T.T.KUNHIKANNAN, V.R.REDDY, VENKATARAMANI, Y.S.Chitale

JUDGMENT

SAWANT, J.:- On July 27, 1991 the President, under Article 143 of the Constitution, referred to this Court three questions for its opinion. The Reference reads as follows:

"Whereas, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 4 of the Inter State Water Disputes Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act), the Central Government constituted a Water Disputes Tribunal called "the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal" (hereinafter called "the Tribunal") by a notification dated 2 June, 1990, a copy whereof is annexed hereto, for the adjudication of the Water Dispute regarding the Inter-State River Cauvery;

Whereas on 25 June 1991, the Tribunal passed an interim Order (hereinafter referred to as "the Order), a copy whereof is annexed hereto;

Whereas, differences have arisen with regard to certain aspects of the Order;

Whereas, on 25 July 199 1, the Governor of Karnataka promulgated the Karnataka Cauvery Basin Irrigation Protection Ordinance, 1991 (hereinafter referred to as "the Ordinance"), a copy whereof is annexed hereto;

Whereas, doubts have been expressed with regard to the constitutional validity of the Ordinance and its provisions;

Whereas, there is likelihood of the constitut















































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top