SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(MP) 410

T.S.DOABIA
OMPRAKASH SONI – Appellant
Versus
ASHOK KUMAR BHARGAVA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.D.Jain, R.K.VASHISTHA, RAMJEE SHARMA

T. S. DOABIA, J.

( 1 ) THE brief facts for the purposes of this writ petition be noticed.

( 2 ) THE present petitioner was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Miana, Tehsil and District of Guna. His election was challenged by the respondent No. 1. The present petitioner filed an application before the respondent No. 5 pleading that the election-petition deserves to be dismissed summarily as this has not been presented in terms of Rule 3 (2) of the M. P. Panchayat Raj (Election Petitions Corrupt Practices and Disqualification for Membership) Rules, 1990 (hereinafter referred to as 'rules' ). The learned counsel for the parties are agreed that the election-petition is to be filed under the aforementioned, rules. ( 3 ) THE election Court has given its decision. The copy of the same is placed on record as Annexure P-1. It has come to the conclusion that copies of the election petition were not attested by the election petitioners. On facts at least, the learned counsel for the parties are agreed that copies of the election-petition when filed were not attested by the election-petitioner. It was attested only by the advocate appearing on behalf of the election- petitioner. It is on the


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top