SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(MP) 953

R.P.AWASTHY, RAJEEV GUPTA
STATE OF M. P. – Appellant
Versus
BUDHRAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DILIP NAYAK, H.S.Chouhan

R. P. AWASTHY, J.

( 1 ) IT is a reference made under Section 366 of the Criminal Procedure Code far confirming the sentence of death awarded to the accused. The accused has also filed an appeal which has been registered as Criminal Appeal No. 1128/95 against the finding of holding him guilty for committing murders of his father Kunkuram, step-mother Ravibai, step brothers Nankua, Chatua and Shankarlal and step-sisters Jugnabai and Muliabai and recommendation for sentencing him to death.

( 2 ) IT has not been disputed by the accused that Kunkuram (since deceased) had left about 20 years prior to the date of incident his married wife Hirabai, daughter Urmila and son accused Budhram at village Basti Baradwar where they used to reside. At that time the daughter of Kunkuram to wit Urmila was aged about 5 years and his son, accused Budhram was aged about 3 years. It had also not been disputed that Kunkuram had kept Ravibai, as his wife and had gone for earning his livelihood alongwith Ravibai towards Allahabad. The mother of the accused brought up the accused and his sister by cultivating the land belonging to Kunkuram. It was she who performed marriage ceremonies of Urmilabai and subseq































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top