SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(MP) 289

A.K.MATHUR, S.C.PANDEY
STATE OF M. P. – Appellant
Versus
G. L. PATEL AND COMPANY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Alok Beohar

S. C. PANDEY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 10 of Letters Patent against the Order dated 29-11-1995, passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in M. C. C. No. 382/95 (State of M. P. and two others v. G. L. Patel), arising out of order dated 16-2-1995, passed by the learned single Judge in M. P. No. 1037/94. The State has also challenged in this appeal, the order passed by the learned single Judge in M. P. No. 1037/94, decided on 16-2-1995. It has also filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the Letters Patent Appeal under Section 5 of Limitation Act against the order dated 16-2-1995 in M. P. No. 1037/94.

( 2 ) XXX XXXX XXXX

( 3 ) THE State has also filed L. P. A. No. 206/95 against the order passed by a learned single Judge in M. C. C No. 383 95 which arose from the order, dated 16/2/ 1995, passed in M. P. No. 1158/94. In this appeal also an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal against the order 16-2-1995 in M. P. No. 1158/94 has been filed by the State. 3. It may be mentioned here that both these appeals are connected because M. P. Nos. 1037/94 and 1158/94 were heard as connected writ petitions. Similarly M. C. C. No


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top