S.C.PANDEY
MOHD. YOUSUF – Appellant
Versus
JYOTSANA BEN – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against he order dated 12-1-90 filed by the objectors der Order 21, Rule 58 (4) of the Code of Civil Procedure. The 1st Additional District Judge to the Court of District Judge, Satha, has rejected the application under Order 21, Rule 58 of the Code of Civil Procedure registered as M. J. C. No. 26/88. This appeal is filed under Order 21, Rule 58 (4) of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Section 96 of the Code.
( 2 ) THE respondents 1 to 4 were the decree holders who filed Execution Case No. 47/79 against the judgment-debtor Mohd. Ahsan Bux. It is alleged in the application under Order 21, Rule 58, filed by the appellants, that the property in question known as 'chandani Talkies', shown as House No. 190/ 1125 Purana Ward No. 11, Satna in the Municipal records, was not liable to attachment. It was alleged inter alia that same property was sold to the appellants by a registered sale deed dated 5-10-70 pursuant to an attachment for recovery of Income-tax dues against the judgment-debtor. The appellants stated that they purchased the attached property after obtaining permission of the Income-tax Officer. They stated that they had deposited Rs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.