SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(MP) 154

A.K.MATHUR, S.C.PANDEY
NIRMALA GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
RAVENDRA KUMAR ALIAS MUNNA GUPTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Pathak, L.S.BAGHEL

S. C. PANDEY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under Clause 10 of Letters Patent against the judgment and decree dated 21-4-87 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in first Appeal No. 1 of 1986 arising out of judgment and decree dated 10-12-75 passed by District Judge, Rewa, in Civil Suit No. 24-A of 1985.

( 2 ) THE undisputed facts of this case are that the appellant filed the aforesaid civil suit in the Court of District Judge, Rewa, who granted a decree for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on the ground of desertion. He granted permanent alimony at the rate of Rs. 150/- per month to the appellant and further granted under Section 27 of the Act an amount of Rs. 12,350/- or the articles shown in Schedule A. The husband filed an appeal before this Court only in respect of the articles or the refund of money as directed by the learned District Judge. The husband did not challenge the decree of divorce before this Court.

( 3 ) THE appellant / plaintiff had filed an application under Section 13 of the Act for grant of divorce on the ground of desertion against the respondent. Since the decree of divorce and permanent ali














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top