SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(MP) 178

S.B.SAKRIKAR
HARUN KHAN – Appellant
Versus
MAHESHCHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.A.Nigam, M.D.Sinha

S. B. SAKRIKAR. J.

( 1 ) THIS order shall, govern the disposal of all the aforesaid three Criminal Revisions based on similar facts involving common question of law.

( 2 ) THE aforesaid Criminal Revision Nos. 184/96, 185/96 and 186/96 are directed against the order dated 30th Nov. , 1995, passed by Additional Sessions Judge. Mandleshwar in Criminal Revision Nos. 145/95, 147/95 and 146/95 respectively, thereby reversing the order dated 26th April, 1995, passed by Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Maheshwar in Case No. 0/ 94, refusing to register the complaint against the applicants under section 203, Cr. P. C, by the non-applicant Maheshchandra.

( 3 ) FACTS of the aforesaid criminal revisions stated in brief are as under:i. Cr1 Revision No. 184/96:the non-applicant Maheshchandra filed the complaint against the applicant in the Court of Judicial Magistrate. First Class, Maheshwar on the averment that he entered into an agreement of hire purchase with the complainant regarding bus bearing Registration No. MBO-967 in July, 1991 and the applicant obtained Rs. 1,25,000/- from the non-applicant. It was agreed between the parties at the applicant shall pay Rs. 2,00,000/- to the non-applica













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top