SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(MP) 279

R.S.GARG
RAJENDRA NIGAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MANISH DATT, P.D.GUPTA, RAKESH JAIN

R. S. GARG, J.

( 1 ) BY this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the order dated 21-9-95, by which the respondent No. 3 Shri Sharad Chandra Chaturvedi, Advocate has been appointed as a Special Public Prosecutor under Section 24 (8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for conduction of criminal case No. 169/94 (State of M. P. v. Rajendra Nigam @ Rajan Nigam ).

( 2 ) THE petitioner submits that criminal case No. 169/94 is pending in the Court of Shri P. C. Mishra, Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jabalpur for trial of the offence punishable under Section 498-A of IPC. The respondent No. 4 is the complainant in the said case. On report of respondent No. 4, the police registered the offence and on conclusion of the investigation filed the charge-sheet. The learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class framed the charges under Section 498-A of Indian Penal Code read with Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. In the said case, the State was being represented by A. P. P. Shri Anupam Pathak. On 22-7-95, an application under Section 301 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure was filed for appointment of the respondent No. 3 to assist the prosecution. The













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top