R.S.GARG
RAJENDRA NIGAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) BY this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the order dated 21-9-95, by which the respondent No. 3 Shri Sharad Chandra Chaturvedi, Advocate has been appointed as a Special Public Prosecutor under Section 24 (8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for conduction of criminal case No. 169/94 (State of M. P. v. Rajendra Nigam @ Rajan Nigam ).
( 2 ) THE petitioner submits that criminal case No. 169/94 is pending in the Court of Shri P. C. Mishra, Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jabalpur for trial of the offence punishable under Section 498-A of IPC. The respondent No. 4 is the complainant in the said case. On report of respondent No. 4, the police registered the offence and on conclusion of the investigation filed the charge-sheet. The learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class framed the charges under Section 498-A of Indian Penal Code read with Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. In the said case, the State was being represented by A. P. P. Shri Anupam Pathak. On 22-7-95, an application under Section 301 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure was filed for appointment of the respondent No. 3 to assist the prosecution. The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.