( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order dated 23-7-93 passed by J. M. F. C. in Misc. Cr. Case No. 8/93.

( 2 ) APPLICANT is the former husband of the respondent, the latter having been divorced by the former. Both the parties are Mahommedans.

( 3 ) THE order impugned is passed under Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (for short, 'the Act'), directing applicant to pay to his former wife the following amounts :- (A) Rs. 21,000/- towards Mehr; (b) Rs. 2,000/- as price of the articles and things; (c) Rs. 2,000/- for maintenance during the period of Iddat; and (d) Rs. 11,000/- towards a reasonable and fair provision to be made during the period of Iddat.

( 4 ) ALTHOUGH in the revision memo the entire order is assailed, however, at the hearing, the challenge was restricted only to the amount of Rs. 11,000/- directed to be paid as reasonable and fair provision in terms of Sec. 3 (1) (a) of the Act.

( 5 ) I have heard Shri Iqbal Ahmad, learned counsel for applicant and Shri Suresh Garg, learned counsel for respondent.

( 6 ) THE question requiring determination is whether under Sec. 3 (1) (a) of the Act an additional amount over