SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 24

N.K.JAIN
MISHRILAL – Appellant
Versus
NATHU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.Polekar, R.C.Chhazed

N. K. JAIN, J.

( 1 ) -THIS judgment shall also dispose of S. A. No. 508/80 as both these appeals arise out of the judgment and decree dated 25. 3. 80 rendered in first appeal No. 1-a/77 by the court of Distt. Judge, Mandleshwar (West Nimar), in affirmance of the judgment and decree dated 2. 8. 76 passed in C. O. S. No. 3-A/73 by the court of Civil Judge, Class-I, khargone - Camp Mandleshwar.

( 2 ) THE suit giving rise to this appeal was brought by late Balram and the present appellants Mishrilal, bhagwan and Mulibai for partition of disputed lands received in an earlier partition by Balram with his brothers Anandilal and Ramchandra the respondents No. 2 and 3 herein who were also arrayed as proforma defendants in the suit. The respondent No. 1 nathu is the legitimate son of late Balram born of his first wife. Balram had contracted second marriage with appellant No. 3 Mulibai. The appellant No. 1 Mishrilal and No. 2 bhagwan were born of this second wedlock.

( 3 ) THE suit was resisted by defendant -respondent No. ] Nathu. He denied the factum of validity of marriage of Mulibai with balram as also Mishrilal and Bhagwan being legitimate sons of Balram. He also denied any right of Muli




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top