SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 143

DIPAK MISRA, R.K.GUPTA
Shyamkharan Paul – Appellant
Versus
Roopali Promoters and Construction – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shripal Jain, for Appellants.

JUDGMENT

DIPAK MISRA, J. :- In this intra Court appeal, the challenge is to the order dated 12-9-2008 passed by the learned single ,Judge in Writ Petition No. 14545/2007.

2. The appellants as petitioners invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India calling in question the legal validity of the order dated 25-8-2007 passed by the learned Second Additional District Judge, Jabalpur in Civil Suit No. 16453/2007. The learned single Judge has concurred with the conclusion recorded by the trial Judge whereby he had held that the appellants as plaintiffs were required to affix the ad valorem Court fee for declaring the sale-deed 11-5-2004 registered on 12-5-2004/14-5-2004 as null and void.

3. We have heard Mr. Shripal Jain, learned counsel for the appellants, on the question of admission. It is submitted by Mr. Jain that the plaintiff were trying to avoid the sale-deed and, therefore they are only required to pay the fixed Court-fee.

4. On a perusal of the order passed by the learned single Judge. it is perceivable that he has referred to the relief clause of the civil suit which clearly mentions for declaring the document executed by defenda






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top