SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(MP) 88

P.K.TARE, S.M.N.RAINA
Surendrasingh – Appellant
Versus
Lal Sheoraj Bahadursingh – Respondent


Advocates:
A.R. Choubey, for Appellants; C.P. Sen, for Respondents.

Judgement

RAINA, J. : - In Miscellaneous (First) Appeal No. 7 of 1972 a question arose whether a temporary injunction can be issued to restrain a decree-holder from executing his decree against his judgment-debtor. Shiv Dayal, J. who heard the appeal referred the following points for decision by the Division Bench on account of divergent views having been expressed by this Court in different cases : -

(1) Whether in a suit instituted by a judgment-debtor on the ground of fraud or any such other ground, a temporary injunction can be granted restraining the decree-holder from executing his decree against the plaintiff.

(2) When a suit is instituted on the ground that the decree is not binding on the plaintiff and that the execution of the decree will be prejudicial to the plaintiff's right, by a person, who was not a party to the suit in which the decree was passed, can a temporary injunction be issued to restrain the decree-holder from executing his decree aginst his judgment-debtor.

2. Shiv Dayal, J. has pointed out that in Miscellaneous (First) Appeal No 84 of 1962 decided on November, 23, 1962, (Madh Pra) Bhargava, J. held that no order of injunction can be made under Order 39, Rule

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top