SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 47

S.C.VYAS
Madiya @ Mahadev – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Mukesh Sinjoniya with Vivek Singh for applicant;
Joshi, Panel Lawyer for State.

ORDER

1. This revision petition under sections 397 and 40 I of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the order dated 17.10.2005 in Sessions Trial No. 130/2005 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Manawar, District Dhar, whereby trial Court had directed framing of charges against the petitioner under section 306 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. As per the final report submitted by Police, Manawar'. District Dhar before the learned lower Court, the case of the prosecution was that on 21.2.2005 when Basantibai d/o Bhangda Bhil aged about 16 years. of village Piplaj was attending natural call in the forest, then petitioner came there and caught hold of the girl with intend to outrage her modesty and tried to snatch her towards nala. The said Basantibai was opposing the act of the petitioner. At that time Surbai w/o Mohan Bhil, aged about 20 years, and younger sister of Basantibai. Ramabai d/o Bhangda Bhil, aged 11-12 years, who were also attending natural call had witnessed the incident. Both of them pelted stones on petitioner and thereafter petitioner left Basantbai and ran away from the place of incident. The incident was narrated by the said eye-witnesses to the parents of B




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top