Raveendran, C.J. -- 1. The petitioner claims that he worked as ad hoc Assistant Teacher between 8.3.1981 to 30.4.1981 and again from 31.8.1981 to 30.4.1982, that thereafter his services were dispensed with without assigning any reason and without affording any opportunity. He, therefore, filed an application (O.A. No. 967 of 1998) before the M.P. State Administrative Tribunal praying that he may be taken back into service. The said application was dismissed by the Tribunal by order dated 21.5.2002 for the reasons stated in its order passed on the same day in Raghunath Prasad Badgiya v. State of M.P. (O.A. No. 1310/1998). The petitioner has challenged the said order of the Tribunal in this writ petition filed on 11.3.2004 with a further prayer that he may be permitted to work in the post of Assistant Teacher with all back wages and all consequential benefits by regularising his service from the date of initial appointment.

2. When the said writ petition came up before the Division Bench on 11.8.2004, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if the relief granted by a Division Bench of this Court, by order dated 4.11.2003 in W.P. No.