SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.S.Kailasam : R.S.Sarkaria
Bachan Singh
Versus
State Of Punjab
Case No. : 273 of 1979
Date of Decision : 5/4/79
Advocates Appeared: Puri H.K. : Singh Hardev : Sodhi R.S.
Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14, 19 and 21 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 121, 122, 125, 128, 130, 131, 132, 302 and 326 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Sections 354 and 361 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1955 – Section 367 - Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 – Section 360 - Death – Killed - A tractor was brought in which were taken to hospital - Doctor who examined dead bodies and injured person gave necessary certificates - He also sent information to ASI public witness 13 who went to hospital and recorded statement from public witness 12 on basis of which FIR was recorded at police station - Police officer conducted inquest and proceeded with his investigation - Courts below found that medical evidence fully corroborated testimony of injured eyewitness public witness 2 and two other eye-witnesses pws 3 and 12 and found that prosecution had established its case beyond reasonable doubt - Held, When victims could not defend appellant killed three and seriously wounded fourth - Courts below rightly characterized offence as heinous and in circumstances of case they were of view that only appropriate sentence is extreme penalty - I have no hesitation in agreeing with that conclusion - Facts of case may have some resemblance to case in that accused in that case cut his innocent wife and kids under secrecy of night - But other circumstances namely his cold calculated and deliberate murder of innocent children of who had given shelter to him when they were steeping discloses that crime is an extremely brutal and heinous one calling for imposition of death sentence - I agree with trial court and high court and find special reasons required for imposition of death has been clearly made out - In result I find myself unable to agree with reasoning or conclusion arrived at by this court in case mainly on ground that it is not in conformity with decision of constitutional bench of this court in case and that propositions laid down are not within competence of court - Order Accordingly.
P.S. KAILASAM, J.
(1) THIS special leave petition is filed by Bachan Singh, son of Saudagar Singh, from jail against the conviction and sentence imposed on him by the High court of Punjab and Haryana. This court ordered notice to the State and heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State and granted special leave.
(2) THE appellant was tried by the Sessions Judge, Ferozepur, on 3 charges of causing the death of 3 persons Desa Singh the son and Duga Bai and Veeran Bai daughters of Hukam Singh and causing grievous injuries to Vidya Bai, another daughter of Hukam Singh, at about 12 midnight between July 4 and 5, 1977,977, in the courtyard of the house of Hukam Singh. The learned Judge found the appellant guilty of the three charges under S. 302, Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to death on each count. He also found him guilty under S. 326, IPC, for causing grievous hurt with a sharp cutting weapon to Vidya Bai and sentenced him to three years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500.00. Against the convictions and sentences passed the appellant preferred Criminal Appeal 234 of 1978 to the High court. The appeal along with the Reference 3 of 1978 made by the trial Judge for confirmation of sentence of death were heard together by the High court. The High court rejected the appeal and confirmed the convictions and sentences passed on the appellant.
(3) THE case for the prosecution briefly is that the appellant Bachan Singh was convicted under S. 302, Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife and sentenced to imprisonment for life. After undergoing the term of imprisonment he was released. After the release he lived with his cousin(?) Hukam Singh Public Witness 5 for about six months. Hukam Singhs wife and son objected to the appellant living in their house. A few days prior to the occurrence Hukam Singh and his wife went to Nainital in connection with the marriage of their son Desa Singh. On the night of the occurrence 4/07/1977 Desa Singb, son of Hukam Singb, Durga Bai, Veeran Bai and Vidya Bai the daughters of Hukam Singh were in the house. After taking their meals the three daughters slept in the inner courtyard, Durga Bai in one cot and Veeran Bai. and Vidya Bai in another cot near each other. Desa Singh, the son of Hukam Singh, and the appellant slept in the outer courtyard on two separate cots near each other. At about midnight Vidya Bai Public Witness 2 was awakened by the alarm and saw the petitioner inflicting kulhari (axe) blow on the face of her sister Veeran Bai. When Vidya Bai tried to get up the appellant gave kulhari blow on her face and ear. She was unable to speak and fell unconscious. Diwan Singh Public Witness 12 who was sleeping at a distance of 3-4 karms from the cots of Desa Singh and the appellant also woke up on hearing a shriek. He saw the appellant striking Desa Singh with a kulhari. He raised an alarm and Gulab Singh Public Witness 3 who was sleeping at a distance of 50 feet from the cot of Desa Singh woke up and saw the appellant hitting Desa Singh on the neck with a kulhari. On an alarm being raised by the witnesses the appellant threw the kulhari in the courtyard and ran away. Gulab Singh and Diwan Singh PWs 3 and 12 gave chase to the appellant but could not apprehend him. Soon after Kanshi Singh Public Witness 4 and others arrived at the place of occurrence and heard from the witnesses the details of the occurrence.
(4) A tractor was brought in which Durga Bai, Veeran Bai and Vidya Bai were taken to the hospital at Fazilka. The doctor who examined the dead bodies and the injured person gave the necessary certificates. He also sent information to the ASI Public Witness 13 who went to the hospital and recorded the statement from Public Witness 12 on the basis of which the FIR was recorded at the police station at 4.20 a.m. on 5/07/1977. The police officer conducted the inquest and proceeded with his investigation. The courts below found that the medical eviden
followed : Balwant Singh v. State of Punjab
Sarveshwar Prasad Sharma v. State of M. P.
referred to : Dalip Singh v. State of Punjab
Vadivelu Thevar v. State of Madras
Raghubir Singh v. State of U. P.
followed : Jagmohan Singh v. State of V. P.
Budhan Chowdhary v. State of Bihar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.