1. The instant petition is for impugning the order dated 18th January 2007, passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gwalior in Criminal Case No.848/07, whereby the learned Magistrate has issued notice to the petitioners on an application filed by the respondent under section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act").

2. Brief facts of the case are that respondent Smt. Alka Sharma has filed one application under section 12 of the Act against the petitioners. On which the learned Magistrate, vide order dated 18th January 2007, has issued notices to the petitioners. It has been averred in the application that the respondent has married with petitioner No.1 on 16th of May, 2005 at Gwalior. For a period of 4-6 months she became pregnant and thereafter the petitioners started harassing the respondent demanding Rs.2 lacs and one Maruti car from her parents. As the father of the respondent is a pensioner, he could not fulfill the demand. He reported the matter to Mahila Police Station at Padav, Gwalior on 2nd November, 2005 but the report was not lodged and no action was taken. On 3rd February, 2006 the respondent delivered a male child in the hospital. Thereafter, on 17th February, 2006 the petitioners separated the child from the respondent, kept him alongwith them and deserted the respondent. Consequently, since 20th February, 2006 she is living in her matrimonial home without her son. Petitioners are trying to declare the respondent as mentally sick and to remarry the petitioner No.1. Admittedly, one application for divorce has been filed by the petitioner No.1 against the respondent and the respondent has filed an application under section 125 of CrPC claiming maintenance from him and also she has filed another application under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for seeking a decree of restitution of conjugal rights against the petitioner No.1. These applications are pending in the Family Court, Gwalior. On these grounds, the respondent has prayed in the application for taking legal action against the petitioners and also to punish them.

3. The aforementioned act of filing of the application by the respondent and issuance of notice by the Court against the petitioners has been assailed by the petitioners on various grounds. The grounds and decisions thereon are as under :

(A) That, the respondent was mentally sick before the marriage which was not disclosed by the respondent. On this ground, application for divorce has been filed by petitioner No.1 on 15.5.2006 in which proceedings for reconciliation have been failed on 21.9.2006. Only for creating pressure against the petitioner No.1, the present application has been filed on false grounds by the respondent on 23.11.2006.

(B) That, in the application under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act filed by the respondent these facts have not been mentioned by her that on demand of Rs.2 lacs and one Maruti car, she has been harassed by the petitioners and as such the application being on false grounds, proceedings based on it ought to quashed. The grounds in the application are false or not, this fact cannot be decided by this Court during this summary proceeding under section 482 CrPC. The truthfulness or otherwise of the facts mentioned in the application can be decided by the learned Magistrate after due inquiry under the procedure as prescribed by the Act. Hence, the proceeding based on the application cannot be quashed by this Court at this stage on these two grounds.

(C) That, as provided by section 2( q) of the Act, such application under section 12 of the Act cannot be filed against the petitioners No.3 and 4 who are the ladies. In section 2(q) of the Act the term respondent has been defined as under:

"(q) 'respondent' means any adult male person who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the aggrieved person and against whom the aggrieved person has sought any relief under this Act:

Provided that an aggri