SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 58

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA, DIPAK MISRA
Mohd. Syed – Appellant
Versus
Hindustan Petroleum – Respondent


Advocates:
Rakesh Shroti for appellants; Anoop Nair for respondents No.1 & 2.

JUDGMENT

Shrivastava, J. -- 1. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 21.12.1994 passed by the learned 1st Additional District Judge, Bhopal in Civil Suit No. 07-B/91, whereby the suit of the plaintiffs has been dismissed, the plaintiffs have preferred this appeal under section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code').

2. In brief, the case of plaintiffs is that their adult son Mohd. Javed died on account of bum injuries sustained by him while he was trying to save the lives of his next door neighbourers in whose house the fire took place.

3. On 13.1.1991 at about 8 a.m., a fire was reported to be broken out in the house adjoining to the plaintiffs' house, as a result of which their adult young and brave son aged about 23 years (Mohd. Javed) rushed to the said house to save the lives of the inhabitants of that house. In this process, their son succeeded to save the lives but unfortunately put his own life into an end on account of sustaining the serious bum injuries. The fire took place on account of the leakage of the LPG gas which caught fire and ultimately the LPG gas cylinder got burst. The plaintiff's son Mohd. Javed (hereinafter refer




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top