SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(SC) 144

M. HIDAYATULLAH, J. R. MUDHOLKAR, R. S. BACHAWAT, J. M. SHELAT
Jahuri Sah – Appellant
Versus
Dwarika Prasad Jhunjhunwala – Respondent


Advocates:
B.P.JHA, R.C.Prasad, S.C.SINHA, S.T.DESAI, SARJU PRASAD

Judgement

MUDHOLKAR, J. : This is an appeal by certificate from a judgment of the Patna High Court reversing that of the trial Court dismissing the plaintiffs suit for partition and separate possession of their half share in a house and for payment of compensation from May 2, 1947 to September 11, 1951 at the rate of Rs. 200 p.m. with interest and for payment of compensation at the same rate from the date of suit till the recovery of possession of their share in the house.

2. The facts which are not disputed before us are these: The property in dispute is situate within the limits of the municipality of Bhagalpur was purchased jointly by five persons, Jurimal, Gajanand, Ramasahai Sah, Jahuri Sah and Ramgali Sah. The first two of these are father and son (and were members of a joint Hindu family). Both of them are dead, Plaintiffs 1 to 4 are the sons and plaintiff 6 is the widow of Gajanand and plaintiff No. 5 is the widow of Jurimal. Jurimal, Gajanand (constituted a joint Hindu family) and plaintiffs 1 to 4 constituted a joint Hindu family. Ramsahai, Jahuri Sah and Ramgali Sah were brothers and were members of a joint Hindu family. Jahuri Sah is defendant No. 1 and Ramgali Sah is def













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top