SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 238

B.M.GUPTA
Ram Babu Jakheniya – Appellant
Versus
Purushottam Shrimali – Respondent


Advocates:
P.D. Bidua and H.K. Shukla for applicants;
B.B. Shukla for respondent.

ORDER

1. All the four petitions are arising out of one case and having identical question of law, hence, with the consent of the parties they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. During the course of arguments there appears no dispute between the parties on the following relevant factual aspects :

(A) That respondent No.1 Purushottam Shrimali has filed one complaint dated 17.7.1996 against following 6 persons :

1. Akhlendu Arjariya, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Gwalior.

2. Mathuresh Babu Ojha, Additional District Magistrate, Gwalior.

3. Rambabu Jakheniya, Divisional Fire Officer and In-charge of Encroachment Squad, Municipal Corporation, Gwalior.

4. Surendra Singh Bhadauria, Revenue and Property Tax Officer, Municipal Corporation, Gwalior.

5. Surendrachandra Barua, Inspector of Encroachment Squad, Municipal Corporation, Gwalior.

6. Abdul Hameed Siddiki, Assistant In-charge of Encroachment Squad, Municipal Corporation, Gwalior.

as accused including (1) Akhlendu Arjariya, (2) Mathuresh Babu Ojha, (3) Rambabu Jakheniya and (4) Surendra Singh Bahdauria, the present four petitioners. The relevant extracts of the complaint is as under :

1- ---- lHkh vfHk;qDr v









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top