DEEPAK VERMA, RAKESH SAKSENA
Chandra Kumar Kankariya – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
Saksena, J. -- 1. Appellants have filed this appeal against the judgment dated 22.11.1991 passed by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Balaghat, in ST No.32 of 1991 convicting the appellants under sections 302/34, and 201 of IPC and sentencing them to imprisonment for life and rigorous imprisonment for five years respectively. Appellant No.1 Chandra Kumar has been further convicted under section 404 of IPC and sentenced to RI for three years.
2. Briefly stated, the prosecution story is that on 24.10.1990 at about 4:00 p.m. Girish Kumar Tiwari (deceased) had left his house on his Rajdoot Motorcycle No.CIJ-391. When he did not return till late in night, his wife Smt. Roopa Tiwari informed Girish's cousin Pramod Tiwari at about 10-11 O'clock in night. She informed him that Girish had told her that he was going to fetch money from Pragati Plastic Factory, Bhatera. When Girish had gone from house, he had been wearing brown shirt, black terricot full-pant, a gold chain, two gold rings and a wrist watch. On search, when he was not found, on 25.10.1990 Pramod Tiwari lodged the report about his missing at Police Station Balaghat, which was recorded at Rajnamcha No.2099. On getting
1. Kanbi Karan Jatav v. State of Gujarat = [AIR 1966 SC 821]
2. Bakshish Singh v. The State of Punjab = [AIR 1971 SC 2016]
4. H.P. v. Jeet Singh reported in = (1999)4 SCC 370
5. Padala Veera Reddy v. State of A.P. and others = [AIR 1990 SC 79]
3. Maharashtra v. Bharat Fakira Dhiwar = [AIR 2002 SC 16]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.