1. The petitioner in this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 6.5.2006 passed by respondent No.3 Directors Sports and Youth Welfare Department, Bhopal, whereby he has been repatriated to his parent department. This order of repatriation is challenged by the petitioner on the ground that it is contrary to the policy decision of the State Government and when the matter for absorption of the petitioner in the Sports and Youth Welfare Department was under active consideration, the respondents passed the impugned order repatriating the petitioner to his parent department.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was originally appointed and posted as Constable in the Railway Police and his parent department is the respondent No.3 Home Department. In the year 1988, he was deputed in the Economic Offence Wing, Bhopal, vide Annexure P-4. Thereafter, he submitted an application for his deputation-in the Sports and Youth Welfare Department and consequently, he was deputed in the said department of respondent No.3 vide order dated 31.10.1992 (Annexure P-5). Annexure P-6 is policy on deputation issued by the State Government. A